332
ground; the same may be said of all the Lots in the lows, except in Capinge has ; there are but few instances where substantial or dwelling houses have been built upon the line of high water mark; all are more or less removed therefrom, having similar areas for which an equivalent was placed in the Crown lot rate, the rental would stand thus : -
14,527 @ £0.40 for 11,025 = £52..4..8
28,000 @ £0.1..8 for 129 = £268..4..2
42,527 = £320..9..0
wharves, according to rent is paid ; some parties upon such have erected sheds, or occupy this ground. Others form it into gardens, and it does not follow that, because a certain number of square feet is sold, the whole is to be occupied by houses. The Lot is certainly of a peculiar but unavoidable shape, and, if a reduction is to be made, I should not go so far as Mr. Carter, and propose the entire abatement of rent upon the front area and the Town Lot stated to be unavailable for building ; ▲ D.E.F, and figure C. F.G. H. in 7 Carter has rated: all I can think Mr. has to ask for any rights is abatement upon the ▲ D. E. F., as for Marine purposes it may justly be said to be unavailable; therefore, if the triangle alone, as proposed to Mr. Carter it would stand thus:
Present Rent £337-7-3 Reduction £69..0..3 5,400 total reduction. 14,527 8000 @ £0.40 for 11,025 ft = £52..4..8 14,000 @ £0.1..8 for 129 ft = £29.... 42,527 = £194..3..7 £268..6..6Under these circumstances, and if the Committee coincided with Mr. Carter's views and recommended his proposal, I ask whether or not the whole rentals throughout, should not be reduced ; would any of the adjoining proprietors pay rent until a similar reduction were made to their rental, and would not the adjoining proprietors comparing on one side for 10,000 feet less the rent would be
14.
15
332
ground; the same
snay
be sait
6 of all the Lots in
the lows, except in Capinge has ; there are but
few instances where substantial or
dive
dwelling
houses have been built upon the line of high water mack; all are more or less removed
there from,
having
Kinilar
r arcaS
for which an
equivalent
which contain
14527 feet, were placed in the
Cown lot rate, the rental would stand thus : -
14.5.27 @ £.40 for 11025
216.
5
4
£52.
/
4
28,000 @
@ £. 1
8
129
£. 268
42,527
لوان
wharves,
according
rent is paid ; some partic's upon such
have erected sheds, or occupy this
k grounds
DURA DI
others form it into gardens, and it does not;
at follow that, because a certain number of square foot is
sold, the whole is to be occupied by houses. The
Let is certai
certainly of a peculiar
but
unavoidables
shape, and, if a reduction is to be made, I
: should not go so far as Mr Caiter, and propred
o
first the entire abatement of rent upon the front
arca
· and the
Ewn Lot
stated to be unavailable for building ; ▲ D.E.E, and figure C. F.G. H. in 7 Carter has
rate: all Lean think Mr..
to ask for
any rights
is abatement upon the ▲ D. E. E.,
as for Marine purposes it may justly be said
to be unavailable; therefore, if the triangle alone,
į
Present Rent.
7..
337-7-3
Reduction. L. 69
0.
3
"
to Mr. Carter it would stand thus:
5,400 total reduction.
14527
8000
@ 8.40 for 11,025 fr
14,000 @ £.1 for 129 ft.
42527
"
Under these circumstances, and
- L.
52
"
44
#
29
113
L. 194
"
#
6.6
3.7
if the Committee
coincided with Mr.
farters
views and recommended
his proposal, Lask whether
rentals
or not the whole
throughout, should not be reduced ; would any of the adjoining proprietors rect until
a similar reduction were made to their rental,
and would not the adjoining, proprietors compering on one side for 10000 feet less the rent would be
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.